Author Topic: the ignogstic and Occam arguments (Read 5271 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Socrates, I suppose,would query what do people mean by God so as to arrive at a point where it would pay to discuss arguments for Him, but then those very arguments themselves fail to deliver the good, and making no referents that He cannot exist as that Grand Miracle Monger and so forth! So not only does He have incoherent,contradicting attributes, He has noreferents and both ways deny His very existence!
With analysis, it is no argument from ignorance, and none have to traverse the Cosmos or have omniscience!